When the nothing-to-hide argument is unpacked, and its underlying assumptions examined and challenged, we can see how it shifts the debate to its terms, then draws power from its unfair advantage. The nothing-to-hide argument speaks to some problems but not to others. It represents a singular and narrow way of conceiving of privacy, and it wins by excluding consideration of the other problems often raised with government security measures. When engaged directly, the nothing-to-hide argument can ensnare, for it forces the debate to focus on its narrow understanding of privacy. But when confronted with the plurality of privacy problems implicated by government data collection and use beyond surveillance and disclosure, the nothing-to-hide argument, in the end, has nothing to say.
Latest Spotify Activity
Van Halen – On Fire 3 hours ago
The Allman Brothers Band – Blue Sky 3 hours ago
Public Enemy – Show 'Em Whatcha Got 3 hours ago
Beastie Boys – She's Crafty 3 hours ago
Gin Blossoms – Til I Hear It From You 3 hours ago
Follow me on TwitterMy Tweets