When the nothing-to-hide argument is unpacked, and its underlying assumptions examined and challenged, we can see how it shifts the debate to its terms, then draws power from its unfair advantage. The nothing-to-hide argument speaks to some problems but not to others. It represents a singular and narrow way of conceiving of privacy, and it wins by excluding consideration of the other problems often raised with government security measures. When engaged directly, the nothing-to-hide argument can ensnare, for it forces the debate to focus on its narrow understanding of privacy. But when confronted with the plurality of privacy problems implicated by government data collection and use beyond surveillance and disclosure, the nothing-to-hide argument, in the end, has nothing to say.
Latest Spotify Activity
DMX – X Gon' Give It To Ya 3 hours ago
Led Zeppelin – All My Love 3 hours ago
Gordon Lightfoot – If You Could Read My Mind 3 hours ago
Superdrag – Sucked Out 3 hours ago
Jackson Browne – Lives in the Balance 15 hours ago
Follow me on TwitterMy Tweets