When the nothing-to-hide argument is unpacked, and its underlying assumptions examined and challenged, we can see how it shifts the debate to its terms, then draws power from its unfair advantage. The nothing-to-hide argument speaks to some problems but not to others. It represents a singular and narrow way of conceiving of privacy, and it wins by excluding consideration of the other problems often raised with government security measures. When engaged directly, the nothing-to-hide argument can ensnare, for it forces the debate to focus on its narrow understanding of privacy. But when confronted with the plurality of privacy problems implicated by government data collection and use beyond surveillance and disclosure, the nothing-to-hide argument, in the end, has nothing to say.
Latest Spotify Activity
The Cars – I'm Not The One 17 hours ago
Imperial Drag – Spyder 18 hours ago
Whitesnake – Still of the Night 18 hours ago
Extreme – Tragic Comic 2 days ago
Alanis Morissette – Ironic 2 days ago
Follow me on TwitterMy Tweets